The Battle of Fibre Optics: Overhead vs. Underground Cabling

ADSS Fibre, Underground Fibre, Fibre Blog

The Battle of Fibre Optics: Overhead vs. Underground Cabling

In this digital age, the importance of a reliable and efficient internet connection cannot be ignored.

With the rise of high-speed internet, there are various ways to lay fibre optic cable to establish the connection. Two of the most common types are overhead fibre optic cable (ADSS) and fibre optic cable.

ADSS fibre optic is a method of laying fibre optic cables next to conventional equipment. The cables are suspended between the poles and are designed to withstand bad weather conditions. On the other hand, underground fibre optic involves burying the cable underground, usually in tunnels or tunnels. One of the main advantages of

ADSS fibre is its efficiency. By using existing services, it reduces the need for additional infrastructure and saves time and money. On the other hand, underground fibre optics require serious infrastructure investments and labour to dig holes and lay cables.

However, when it comes to reliability, underground fibre has the upper hand. It is protected against weather conditions that could damage overhead lines, such as high winds, lightning and even hurricanes. Weather events can cause service interruptions, which can be costly for businesses and inconvenience to consumers. Additionally, underground fibre optics are less susceptible to damage from man-made accidents such as construction work or vehicle accidents.

Additionally, underground fibre optic provides better security as it cannot be easily accessed through testing or testing. This is a big problem, especially for companies that deal with private and confidential information. ADSS fibre, on the other hand, is very susceptible to damage because it is easily accessed and thieves can cut copper cables or other valuable equipment.

From an aesthetic perspective, underground fibre optic is a clear winner. The cables are hidden underground and the area is not touched. This is especially true in areas where there are strict rules regarding available benefits. ADSS fibres can be considered optical, especially in residential areas.

Another important thing to consider is maintenance. ADSS fibre is easily accessible, making repairs and maintenance easier. This allows service outages to be resolved quickly. Underground fibre, on the other hand, requires specialized equipment and digging to reach and repair any damage; This can be time consuming and expensive. Finally, installation and shipping time is an important factor to consider. Since ADSS fibre uses existing infrastructure, it can be installed quickly. This is especially important in rural areas where infrastructure is lacking. On the other hand, underground fibre requires extensive planning and approval and the installation process can take a long time, making it an unfeasible option in remote areas.

Conclusion,

Both ADSS fibre and underground fibre have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. The decision ultimately comes down to the specific needs and circumstances of the location where the fibre optic cables need to be installed. While ADSS fibre may be a more cost-effective option, underground fibre offers better reliability, security, and aesthetics. As technology advances, we can expect to see further innovations and advancements in both methods of laying fibre optic cables, providing us with even better internet connectivity.

Contact us today for your solution!


Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors